<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Phil Dawes' Stuff - Latest Comments in Why Objective Caml?</title><link>http://phildawesstuff.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:17:32 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Why Objective Caml?</title><link>http://www.phildawes.net/blog/2006/08/29/why-objective-caml/#comment-2753468</link><description>There is one more benefit from programming in OCaml compared with Python, Lisp, Java, etc.  It is the comparably strong type system and automatic types inference.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also chose OCaml to program arithmetic and I am really very pleased with my choice.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nowdays I use OCaml to do many other things as well, and learning OCaml and functional programming was an enlightening experience.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, wish you good luck</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Victor</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:17:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Objective Caml?</title><link>http://www.phildawes.net/blog/2006/08/29/why-objective-caml/#comment-2753467</link><description>&amp;gt; OCaml consistently kicks the collective butts...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Strange that you compared OCaml to the slower Java -client instead of Java -server&lt;br&gt;[Java -server](http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4sandbox/benchmark.php?test=all&amp;amp;lang=ocaml&amp;amp;lang2=java)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Strange not to compare OCaml with other compiled languages rather than with interpreted languages like Python, Perl and Ruby.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Isaac Gouy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:09:41 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>