<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Phil Dawes' Stuff - Latest Comments in python cgi vs php</title><link>http://phildawesstuff.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://phildawesstuff.disqus.com/python_cgi_vs_php/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 05:24:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: python cgi vs php</title><link>http://www.phildawes.net/blog/2004/06/01/python-cgi-vs-php/#comment-2752831</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Python lags a little behind PHP for some web applications but what if your application requirs a connection with some other processes (or maybe devices) that requirs coding in C.. if u still insist on PHP then code all ur application in C and kick away all those heavy script interperators!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ce</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 05:24:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: python cgi vs php</title><link>http://www.phildawes.net/blog/2004/06/01/python-cgi-vs-php/#comment-2752830</link><description>&lt;p&gt;DB adds between 0.01 and 0.09 of a second in python&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phil Dawes</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 14:22:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>