<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Phil Dawes' Stuff - Latest Comments in Multi-Methods in factor</title><link>http://phildawesstuff.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://phildawesstuff.disqus.com/multi_methods_in_factor/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 04:18:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Multi-Methods in factor</title><link>http://www.phildawes.net/blog/2008/06/09/multi-methods-in-factor/#comment-2753752</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I share your sentiment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;All the while Factor is making it painful to use 'mainstream' languages as I get used to some of these basic abstractions!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Wearn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 04:18:45 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>