<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Phil Dawes' Stuff - Latest Comments in microqueries</title><link>http://phildawesstuff.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://phildawesstuff.disqus.com/microqueries/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2005 10:03:36 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: microqueries</title><link>http://www.phildawes.net/blog/2005/10/29/micro-queries/#comment-2753182</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Phil, where you find the Sparql / SQL approach doesn't cut if for you (and it never has for me), you might find the Versa equivalent more palpable.  It's written with the RDF model in mind and is influenced by more recent precedent than SQL (REGEX and XPath)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;see:  &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Versa" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Versa"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chimezie</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2005 10:03:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>