Hello! Phil Dawes' Stuff is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.
Community Page
- phildawes.net/blog/ Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- Hi, Do you feel that your agility in Factor has improved since this post? Roger
- Thanks for the pointer - I've cleaned up the spam and regrettably added some moderation
- I'm loving the comments thread for this post. Can't decide whether to get my upholstery cleaned or do something about my fast food obesity.
- Cool - thanks Eric
- I pasted some code that does the moving sum in factor. http://paste.factorcode.org/paste?id=569#282
Jump to original thread »
Seth posted a response to my ‘global identifiers don’t scale’ post that I didn’t expect. His point is that it is the meaning that isn’t consistent across the semantic web, not the identifiers. I agree with him about meaning being inconsis
... Continue reading »
3 years ago
My view point is not directly linked to application of unique ids in RFF though. I believe this is the case for a larger scope of which the semantic web is one part...
I believe you have layed out sensible arguments in your post. If we now take the bad scalability of GUID schemes as a real world's fact, I can conclude that the real world will ultimately rely on a complex mesh of separate GUID schemes (we already have the premices of it, right ;)
We would need some ways to reconcile these schemes where they intersect. What are your views on how this kind of reconcilation can be modeled with the current semantic tools?