<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Phil Dawes' Stuff - Latest Comments in Lisp aesthetics (and OO message passing)</title><link>http://phildawesstuff.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 04:42:46 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Lisp aesthetics (and OO message passing)</title><link>http://www.phildawes.net/blog/2006/07/20/lisp-aesthetics-and-oo-message-passing/#comment-2753405</link><description>Forth is another system in which you write a new language to match your problem; it is equally as fun exploring the many OO systems people have built on top of Forth, which has the added challenge of Reverse Polish Notation.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 04:42:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lisp aesthetics (and OO message passing)</title><link>http://www.phildawes.net/blog/2006/07/20/lisp-aesthetics-and-oo-message-passing/#comment-2753404</link><description>Standards are great, and with Lisp everyone can have one :-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I haven't done any Lisp for about 10 years, but when solving a problem in Lisp the first thing you do is write a language that helps you express the solution...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian Rogers</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 08:14:19 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>