<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Phil Dawes' Stuff - Latest Comments in Imaginary numbers: 'Better Explained' does it again</title><link>http://phildawesstuff.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://phildawesstuff.disqus.com/imaginary_numbers_better_explained_does_it_again/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:44:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Imaginary numbers: 'Better Explained' does it again</title><link>http://www.phildawes.net/blog/2008/02/21/imaginary-numbers-better-explained-does-it-again/#comment-2753700</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed.  I came across Kalid's post also, and he is extraordinarily impressive in terms of bringing the esoteric down to earth.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By the way, learning from your posting style.  Very short posts make it easy to browse through your blog.  I may adopt that style too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bradley Chung</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:44:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>