Hello! Phil Dawes' Stuff is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.
Community Page
- phildawes.net/blog/ Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- Hi, Do you feel that your agility in Factor has improved since this post? Roger
- Thanks for the pointer - I've cleaned up the spam and regrettably added some moderation
- I'm loving the comments thread for this post. Can't decide whether to get my upholstery cleaned or do something about my fast food obesity.
- Cool - thanks Eric
- I pasted some code that does the moving sum in factor. http://paste.factorcode.org/paste?id=569#282
Jump to original thread »
Have just read the tagwebs page (thanks Seth). For me, the problem with all the meta-tag structured data ideas (including tripletags in its current form) is in disambiguation of ’senses’ of a tag. The tagweb idea plays out well until you have multiple meanings for
... Continue reading »
4 years ago
I've playing with something vaguely similar to your tripletags. I'm taking the approach of trying to map tags to a collaboratively developed ontology (and hopefully thereby be able to make interesting inferences). I've struggled a bit with the tag sense issue also - e.g. I've gone back and forth on whether or not the relationship between ontology elements and tags is inverse functional (which maps to the question of how to deal with multiple tag senses). Anyway, thought you might be interested in checking it out - it's at:
http://labs.intellidimension.com/ontag/
Geoff
4 years ago