<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Phil Dawes' Stuff - Latest Comments in Bzr Vs Mercurial (again)</title><link>http://phildawesstuff.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:38:49 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Bzr Vs Mercurial (again)</title><link>http://www.phildawes.net/blog/2006/05/09/bzr-vs-mercurial-again/#comment-2753334</link><description>Trying out bzr it's working out great for me. &lt;br&gt;Just curious, how do you track bugs?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ifeanyi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:38:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bzr Vs Mercurial (again)</title><link>http://www.phildawes.net/blog/2006/05/09/bzr-vs-mercurial-again/#comment-2753332</link><description>Hi, Phil -&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mercurial already tracks rename information, and one of the core developers is about to start working on the transfer of data across rename boundaries when merges occur.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So you should rest assured that within a pretty short time, you'll have all the functionality you need, but with that nice performance on top :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bryan O'Sullivan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 15:57:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bzr Vs Mercurial (again)</title><link>http://www.phildawes.net/blog/2006/05/09/bzr-vs-mercurial-again/#comment-2753333</link><description>Sounds like bzr performance is the focus for the next version:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/34" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/34&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick Thomas</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 12:17:30 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>