Hello! Phil Dawes' Stuff is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.
Community Page
- phildawes.net/blog/ Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- Hi, Do you feel that your agility in Factor has improved since this post? Roger
- Thanks for the pointer - I've cleaned up the spam and regrettably added some moderation
- I'm loving the comments thread for this post. Can't decide whether to get my upholstery cleaned or do something about my fast food obesity.
- Cool - thanks Eric
- I pasted some code that does the moving sum in factor. http://paste.factorcode.org/paste?id=569#282
Jump to original thread »
Ok - for me it boils down to: hg’s speed vs bzr’s renames
Mercurial is much much quicker. That’s not an imperical measurement using a large source tree - it’s an anecdotal observation on a tiny one.
For example, just typing ‘hg&%2 ... Continue reading »
Mercurial is much much quicker. That’s not an imperical measurement using a large source tree - it’s an anecdotal observation on a tiny one.
For example, just typing ‘hg&%2 ... Continue reading »
3 years ago
http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/34
3 years ago
Mercurial already tracks rename information, and one of the core developers is about to start working on the transfer of data across rename boundaries when merges occur.
So you should rest assured that within a pretty short time, you'll have all the functionality you need, but with that nice performance on top :-)
2 years ago
Just curious, how do you track bugs?